Gsoftnet
Showing posts with label Scrutiny Cases. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scrutiny Cases. Show all posts

How to tackle with Income Tax Notices ?

Many of my family members & friends are receiving notices from Income tax department; usually any communication from the Income Tax department, especially receiving a notice from them, can send shivers down anyone's spine. A majority of the notices is sent in the normal course of processing returns& might be for routine enquiry or a request for simple clarification, so don’t be panic.

What to do when you receive an Income Tax notice?

  1. Don’t Ignore: Handle the situation carefully and sincerely, or you may end up paying a penalty of up to Rs 10,000 along with the tax payment.
  2. Back to basics: Check the whether the notice is really meant for you by checking basic things like PAN, Name, Assessment year it related to issuing officer, signature, address with details of ward and circle number. Verify these details to avoid being cheated. To see details go to E filling website see know your AO
  3. Preserve the envelope: If the notice comes by snail mail, preserve the envelope. It serves as proof of the dates on which it was posted and received.
  4. DIN: If the notice is delivered online, then check the Document Identification Number.
  5. Identify the reason behind the notice: By normal reading one can easily indentifies the reason behind notice. Reasons could be a simple mismatch in TDS or inconsistency in your returns, or some serious concerns like income concealment. It can also be a survey or scrutiny of accounts.
  6. Validity: Check the validity of the notice and the timely issuance. Also check the section under which the notice has been issued. For example: A notice under Section 143(3) for scrutiny assessment has to be served within six months of the end of the financial year in which the return was filed. If served later than this period, it will be considered invalid.
  7. Gather the documents: Start collecting the documents that the department has requested via the notice. Documents needed can vary depending on the gravity of the notice, usually scrutiny notice may ask for several documents, including bank statements, pay-slips, rent receipts and brokerage statements. While it may not be possible to put all this together in the short time.
  8. Letter: Prepare a covering letter along with the set of documents.
  9. Acknowledgement: Prepare two set of all the documents required, along with a copy of the covering letter. Get your copy stamped to maintain personal records, and as a proof of submission of the documents thereby complying with the notice.
  10. Reply on time: Always respond to the notice on time even if you are unable to collect the required documents. You can even ask for some time to gather all the documents. Timely response will help establish that you are honest, and cooperating with the law.
  11. CA help : If the notice is simply about a factual matter, such as an arithmetical error, TDS mismatch or deduction amount, a taxpayer should respond on his own, Only when it is a serious issue, such as a notice for scrutiny or reassessment under Section 148, should one get a professional to respond. But A chartered accountant will be better equipped to deal with the situation and provide apt responses.
Interpreting notices under different sections of income tax for individuals
Sec 131(1A): Assessing officer has reason to suspect that income has been concealed.
  • Enforcing the attendance of any person, including any officers of a banking company and examining him on oath and completing the production of books of accounts and documents.
  • Failure to comply with the summons issued under Section 131(1) has been made punishable with a penalty of Rs 10,000 for each default under Section 272A.
Sec 133(A) : For survey or scrutiny of accounts
Sec 139(9) : For filing defective return
Sec 142    : For not filing the income tax return or for the scrutiny of a documents & accounts in support of the return filed by the tax payer
Sec 143(1) : For adjustment or additional tax demand if an error or incorrect information is detected in the return filed by the tax payer.
Sec 143(2) : For scrutiny assesement after detailed inquiry by assessing officer
Sec 148    : For reassessment if the officer believes some income has escaped assessment.
Sec 156    : For dues(tax, interest,penalty,fine or any other sum) payable by the assessee)
Sec 245    : For adjustment of refund with any demand due

Reasons behind getting Notice :
Return not filed or delayed: Employer deducted tax from you salary. However, Employee did not file the return. In such a case, the tax department will send a notice asking employee to file the return. The notice has to be responded to within the given time. Otherwise, employee may be penalized. Such a notice can be sent for any of the previous six assessment years. In case of delayed filing, the department can levy a penalty of Rs 5,000 a year. However, the penalty is not mandatory, and depends upon the discretion of the assessing officer. However, if any tax is due, the department charges 1% interest per month from the due date.

Mismatch in tax credit: Tax deducted at source, or TDS, figure in your Form 16 may be different from the actual tax credit mentioned in Form 26 AS, a document issued by the income tax department that has all your tax-related information such as tax deducted, refund, etc, against your permanent account number (PAN). In case there is mismatch between the two, the department goes by the figure in Form 26 AS.

The mismatch could be because either the employer has not deposited the tax deducted from your salary with the department or has credited it in someone else's account. In such a case, you have to file a rectified return.

If the employer has not paid the TDS to the tax department, point this out to him. In case the tax has being credited to someone else's account, furnish the TDS certificate to the assessing officer for making the necessary changes.

Investments in the name of spouse
Many individuals resort to purchasing assets in the name of their spouse, children or other close family members in the hope of evading taxes. Assets in this case refer to any kind of investment like land, buildings, fixed deposits, mutual funds, shares, debentures etc.

Let's say x bought mutual funds in your wife¡¦s name. As per section 64 of the Income Tax Act, any income x generate out of these mutual funds is still considered x income and x will be taxed for it.

You need to ensure that you declare such income at the time of filing your return, else you will attract attention from the taxman and receive a notice for the same.

High Value Transactions
High value transactions need to be updated to the Income Tax department by the entity with which you carry out such a transaction. This is in order to ensure taxes are levied as required on each of these transactions in a timely manner. Failure to do so is an invitation for a tax notice.

What qualifies as a high value transaction?
  • Cash deposits in a bank worth Rs 10 lakh or more in a year
  • Credit card purchases of Rs 2 lakh or more
  • Mutual fund investments for Rs 2 lakh or more
  • Purchase of bonds and debentures worth Rs 5 lakh or more in a year
  • Sale or purchase of property worth Rs 30 lakh or more
Non-disclosure of assets for wealth tax
If you own assets whose net value is over Rs.30 Lakhs, you are liable to pay wealth tax at the rate of 1% of the amount that is above the Rs.30 Lakhs limit. If you do disclose such assets that you own or do not pay taxes on them, there is a good chance that you might receive an IT notice.

Assets can include anything from land, second homes, cars, yachts, gold jewellery, antiques, art etc. If you are unsure about the exact value of the assets you own, you can approach government approved valuers for this purpose.

Random Scrutiny
To enforce tax compliance, the IT department has started randomly scrutinizing returns under section 143 (3). If you receive such a scrutiny notice, don¡¦t panic. Just follow these simple steps:
  1. Check the validity of the notice as well as the duration within which you have to respond to the Assessing Officer. Usually, a scrutiny notice is served to the assessee within a period of 6 months from the end of the financial year. Very rarely, notices related to older cases are also sent under section 148, if the Assessing Officer finds genuine reason to do so.
  2. Make multiple copies of the notice received
  3. Submit documents requested along with a cover letter listing all the documents to the Assessing Officer
  4. Request for an acknowledged copy of the cover letter from the Assessing Officer for your own records
  5. If the notice is regarding your old dues, they can be adjusted against any pending refund claims made by you for a current year.
What Should One do in a Scrutiny Proceeding ?
 
When you receive notice from Income tax department , Do this things
  1. Ensure that all related documents to the assessment proceeding with you.Ex Form 16, 26AS, Previous year ITRs, Proofs for deductions, Wealth tax file, bank accounts, etc… details regarding all monetary transaction
  2. For salaried person, keep your Form 16 issued by your employer.
  3. All your bank statements .
  4. Reasons for high amount transactions.
  5. Documents, details asked in notice.
  6. If you have received any loan or gift, get a certificate from such person with his complete address on the loan certificate.
  7. On hearing date ,you must appear either yourself or through any Chartered Accountant or tax practitioner before the Assessing Officer on the date of hearing.
  8. Keep calm & argue politely with A.O. by quoting relevant sections
  9. Take acknowledgment for copies submitted
  10. Write down relevant points.

CBDT Notification reg. undisclosed Income during Search/Survey.

Recently on 18th December, 2014 CBDT has issued a notification regarding "Admission of Undisclosed Income under coercion/pressure during Search/Survey".  In this matter CBDT has already issued a notification on 09.01.2014 during this calender year vide Letter No. 286/98/2012-IT(Inv.II).  Read the notification which is as under :

Instances/complaints of undue influence/coercion have come to notice of the CBDT that some assessee were coerced to admit undisclosed income during Searches/Surveys conducted by the Department.  It is also seen that many such admissions are retracted in the subsequent proceedings since the same are not backed by credible evidence.  Such actions defeat the very purpose of Search/Survey operations as they fail to bring the undisclosed income to tax in a sustainable manner leave alone levy of penalty or lunching of prosecution.  Further, such actions show the Department as a whole and officers concerned in poor light.

I am further directed to invite your attention to the Instructions/Guidelines issued by CBDT from time to time, as referred above, through which the Board has emphasized upon the need to focus on gathering evidences during search/survey and to strictly avoid obtaining admission of undisclosed income under coercion/undue influence.

In view of the above, while reiterating the aforesaid guidelines of the Board, I am directed to convey that any instance of undue influence/coercion in the recording of the statement during Search/Survey/ other proceeding under the I.T. Act, 1961 and/or recording a disclosure of undisclosed income under undue pressure/coercion shall be viewed by the Board adversely.

These guidelines may be brought to the notice of all concerned in your Region for strict compliance.

I have been further directed to request you to closely observe/oversee the actions of the officers functioning under you in this regard.

This issues with approval of the Chairperson, CBDT.

To read more details Download Notification (Click Here) 

CBDT advise not to frame high pitched assessments whose Accounts Books were destroyed in floods of Jammu and Kashmir.

Recently Central Board of Direct Taxes has issued a notification for Scrutiny assessment of Jammu and Kashmir State assessees'.  In this notification CBDT advice to AOs for conducting scrutiny assessment proceedings in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, if the Assessee's Accounts Books were lost or destroyed in the floods.  If the difficulties conveyed by the assessees are found to be genuine and beyond his control making him unable to produce books of accounts etc., the pending assessments may be completed on the basis of materials available on record. The notification regarding Advisory for conducting scrutiny assessment proceedings is as under :

F.No.225/303/2014/ITA.II
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

New Delhi, the November, 2014

To,
The Chief Commissioner of Income-tax,
Amritsar

Madam.

Subject:- Advisory for conducting scrutiny assessment proceedings in the State of Jammu and Kashmir, in the aftermath of Floods — regarding.

It has come to the notice of the Board that due to recent devastation caused by the floods in the State of Jammu & Kashmir, the income-tax assessees of that State are facing difficulties in ensuring compliance either with the requirements under ongoing scrutiny assessment proceedings or with respect to notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act') issued recently.

2. In such cases, where an assessee under scrutiny claims that he is unable to make certain compliances due to destruction of records, documents and books of accounts etc. in the floods, the Assessing Officer may ascertain from the district administration whether the area in which the business premises of the assessee concerned is located and where the books of accounts, documents etc. are claimed to had been kept was affected by the recent floods or not. If the difficulties conveyed by the assessees are found to be genuine and beyond his control making him unable to produce books of accounts etc., the pending assessments may be completed on the basis of materials available on record. The Assessing Officers are further advised to keep in mind the following points while finalizing assessments in such cases:-
  1. In cases of non-production of books of accounts, documents, records etc. requisitioned u/s 143(2) / 142(1) of the Act, the Assessing Officer, even if invoking the provisions of section 144 of the Act, should avoid framing a high pitched assessment containing frivolous additions merely on account of non-production of relevant books of accounts, documents or records;
  2. Third party verifications, if necessary, should generally be made in cases where such third party is located outside the affected areas. Taking recourse to special audit u/s 142(2A) and conducting surveys u/s 133A of the Act should only be done in cases with substantial merit and with prior approval of CIT concerned; 
  3. If a particular case has been completed under scrutiny during earlier years, the records concerned could be perused to understand the trend in business activity. If it is possible to draw any reasonable and convincing inference, the same may be utilized while finalizing the pending scrutiny assessment;
  4. Post-assessment action on recovery of outstanding demand should be decided by the Assessing Officer on a case to case basis and after taking into consideration the assessee's financial condition in the aftermath of floods;
  5. The Income-tax Authorities should expeditiously take all necessary steps with adequate sensitivity to resolve grievances and difficulties faced by the tax payers.
4. The above may be brought to the notice of all concerned for compliance. Affected tax payers may also be informed suitably through a Press Note to be issued by the CCIT, Amritsar.

Yours faithfully.
(Riche Rastogi)
Under Secretary (ITA,I1)

Download the notification regarding Advisory for conducting scrutiny assessment proceedings (Click Here)

If 26AS Statement mismatch face as scrutiny - CBDT directs to AO for Asstt. Year 2015-16.

CBDT has issued a instruction No. 7/2014 dated 26th Sept., 2014, directs to AO to enquire into only AIR data/26AS mismatch issues if scrutiny is made on this basis for Fin. Year 2014-15 i.e. Asstt. Year 2015-16 under Section 143, read with Section 142 of The Income-Tax Act, 1961.  The details of this notification is as under:

It has come to the notice of the Board that uring the scrutiny assessment proceedings some of the AOs are routinely calling for information which is not relevant, for enquiry into the issues to be considered. This has been causing undue harassment to the taxpayers and has also drawn adverse criticism from several quarters. Further, feedback and analysis of such orders indicates that many times the core issues, which formed the basis of selection of the case for scrutiny were not examined properly. Such instances primarily occurred in cases selected for scrutiny under Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection ('CASS') for verification of specific information obtained from third party sources which apparently did not match with the details submitted by the tax saver in the return of-income.

Therefore, for proper administration of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('Act'), Central Board of Direct Taxes, by virtue of its powers under sect on 119 of the Act, in suppression of earlier instructions/guidelines on this subject, hereby directs that the cases selected for scrutiny during the Financial Year 2014-20(15 under CASS, on the basis of either AIR data or CIB information or for non re-con'lliation with 26AS data the scope of enquiry should be limited to verification of these circular aspects only. Therefore, in such cases, an Assessing Officer hall confine the questionnaire and subsequent enquiry or verification only to the specific point(s) on the basis of which the particular return has been selected for scrutiny.

The reason(s) for selection of cases under CASS are displayed to the Assessing Officer in AST application and notice u/s 143(2), after generation from AST, is issued to the taxpayer with the remark 'Selected under Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection (CASS)". The functionality in AST is being modified suitably to flag the reasons for scrutiny selection in AIR/CIB/26AS cases. This functionality is expected to be operational by 15 th October, 2014. Further, the Assessing Officer while issuing notice under section 142(1) of the Act which is enclosed with the first questionnaire would proceed to verify only the specific aspects requiring examination/verification. In such cases, all efforts would be made to ensure that assessment proceedings are completed expeditiously in minimum possible number of hearings without unnecessarily dragging the case till the time-barring date.

In case, during the course of assessment proceedings, it is found that there is potential escapement of income exceeding Rs. 10 lakhs (for non-metro charges, the monetary limit shall be Rs. 5 lakhs) on any other iss e(s) apart from the AIR/CIB/26AS information based on which the case was selected under CASS requiring substantial verification, the case may be taken up for comprehensive scrutiny with the approval of the Pr. CIT/DIT concerned. However, such an approval shall be accorded by the Pr. CIT/DIT in writing after being satified about merits of the issue(s) necessitating wider and detailed scrutiny in the case. Cases so taken up for detailed scrutiny shall be monitored by the it. CIT/Addl. CIT concerned.

The contents of this Instruction should be immediately brought to the notice of all concerned for strict compliance.

Download 26AS mismatch Scrutiny Notification (Click Here)

Compulsory manual selection of cases for scrutiny during the Financial Year 2014-15

CBDT has issued an instruction No. 6/2014 u/s. Section 143 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 regarding Compulsory Manual Selection of Cases for Scrutiny During Financial Year 2014-15

Instruction No.. 6/2014
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
North-Block, IT (A-II) Division
New Delhi the 2nd of Sep., 2014

To

All Pr. Chief-Commissioners of Income-tax/Chief-Commissioners of Income-tax
All Pr. Directors-General of Income-tax/Directors-General of Income-tax

Sir/Madam

Subject: Compulsory manual selection of cases for scrutiny during the Financial Year 2014-15-regd.

1.    In supersession of earlier Instructions on the above subject, the Board hereby lays down the following procedure and criteria for manual selection of returns/cases for scrutiny d ing the financial-year 2014-2015:-
  • Cases involving addition in an earlier assessment year in excess of Rs. 10 lakhs on a substantial and recurring question of law or fact which is confirmed in appeal or is pending before an appellate authority.
  • Cases involving addition in an earlier assessment year on the Issue of transfer pricing in excess of Rs. 10 crore or more on a substantial and recurring question of Jaw or fact which is confirmed in appeal or is pending before an appellate authority.
  • All assessments pertaining to Survey under section 133A of the Act excluding the cases where there are no impounded books of accounts/documents and returned income excluding any disclosure made during the Survey is not less than returned income of preceding assessment year. However, where assessee retracts the disclosure made during the Survey will not be covered by this exclusion.
  • Assessments in search and seizure cases to be made under section 1588, 1588C, 1588D, 153A & 153C read with section 143(3) of the Act and also for the turns filed for the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which authorization for search and seizure was executed u/s 132 or 132A of the Act.
  • Returns filed in response to notice under section 148 of the Act.
  • Cases where registration u/s 12AA of the IT Act has not been granted or has been cancelled by the CIT/DIT concerned, yet the assessee has been found I to be claiming tax-exemption under section 11 of the Act. However, Where such orders of the CIT/DIT have been reversed/set-aside in appellate proceedings, those cases will not be selected under this clause.
  • Cases where order denying the approval u/s 10(23C) of the Act or withdrawing the approval already granted has been passed by the Competent Authority, yet the assessee has been found claiming tax-exemption under the aforesaid provision of the Act.
  • Cases in respect of which specific and verifiable information pointing out tax-evasion Is given by Government Departments/Authorities. The Assessing Officer http://www.itatonline.org shall record reasons and take prior approval from jurisdictional Pr. CCIT CCIT/Pr. DGIT/DGIT concerned before selecting such a case for scrutiny.
2.    Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection (CASS): Cases are also being selected under CASS on the basis of broad based selection filters. list of such cases shall be separately Intimated In due course by the DGIT(Systems) to the jurisdictional authorities concerned.

3.    It Is reiterated that the targets for completion of scrutiny assessments and strategy framing quality assessments as contained in Central Action Plan document for Financial-Year 2014-2015 has to be complied with and it must be ensured that all scrutiny assessment orders including the cases selected under the manual criterion are completed through the AST system software only Further, in order to ensure the quality of assessments being framed, Pr. CCsIT/C.CsIT/Pr. DsGIT/DsGIT should evolve a suitable monitoring mechanism and by 30' April, 2015, such authorities shall send a report to the respective Zonal Member with a Copy to Member (IT) containing details of at least 50 quality assessment orders from their respective charges. In this regard, IT Authorities cbncemed must ensure that cases selected for publication in let us Share' are picked up only from tide quality assessments as reported.

4.    These instructions may be brought to the notice of all concerned. If considered necessary, a supplementary guideline would be issued subsequently.

5.    Hindi version to follow.

(Rohit Garg)
Deputy-Secretary to the Government of India
F.No. 225/229/ 2014/ITA.II

Copy to:
1.    PS to FM/05D to FM/PS to MoS (R)/OSD to MoS(R)
2.    PS TO Secretary (Revenue)
3.    Chairperson, CBDT & NI Members, CBDT
4.    All Joint Secretaries/CsIT, CBDT
5.    Directors/Deputy Secretaries/Under Secretaries of CBDT
6.    DIT(PR,PP&OL), Mayur Bhawan, N.Delhi
7.    The Comptroller and Auditor-General of India
8.    ITCC Division, CBDT
9.    The 35 & Legal Advisor, Ministry of Law & Justice
10.    MC, 'No An-for uploading on the Department's website
11.    Data-Base Cell for uploading on irs officers website

(Rohlt Garg)
Deputy-Secretary to the Government • f India

Compulsory Scrutiny during the Fin. Year 2013-14 New Amendment.

The Income Tax Department has issued an instruction No. 13/2013 dated 20th Sep., 2013 regarding Compulsory manual selection of cases for scrutiny during the Fin. Year 2013-14.  Earlier the department had issued an instruction No. 10/2013 dated 05.08.2013 u/s. 143 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - Assessment - General Procedure and Criteria for Selection of Scrutiny Cases under Compulsory Manual Selection of Returns During Financial Year 2013-14.

I am directed to state that Instruction No. 10 of 2013 dated 05.08.2013 of CBDT on the above captioned subject is partially modified as under:-

In Para 3, after clause (i), following clauses(s) has been inserted:-
(j) Cases where registration u/s. 12 AA of the Income Tax Act has not been grated or has been cancelled by the CIT/DIT and the assessee has been found claiming Tax-Exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act.  However, the cases where such order of CIT/DIT has been reversed/Set-aside in appellate proceedings will not be picked up for scrutiny under this clause.
(k) Cases where order denying the approval u/s. 10(23C) of the Income Tax Act or withdrawing the approval already granted has been passed by the Competent-Authority and the assessee has been found claiming tax-exemption under the aforesaid provision of the Income Tax Act.

I am further directed to state that the above may be brought to the notice of all officers working under your jurisdiction for necessary compliance.