Death Claims to be Processed within 07 Days and Retirement Claims to be Settled on the Day of Retirement

Press Information Bureau 

Government of India

Ministry of Labour & Employment

18-November-2016 11:25 IST

Death Claims to be Processed within 07 Days and Retirement Claims to be Settled on the Day of Retirement 

Payment of Statutory Contributions Henceforth only through Internet Banking 

The Prime Minister of India during the PRAGATI review meeting held on 26th October desired that claims related to death cases be prioritized and expedited and retirement claims may be settled on the day of retirement. In accordance, the processes have been reviewed and instructions have been issued to field offices to settle death claims within a period of 07 days from the date of receipt of proposal and retirement claims on the day of retirement. The officials in the facilitation centre of field offices have been instructed to scrutinize the claims and guide the claimant regarding submission of required documents in appropriate shape. An official has been posted in the facilitation centers of EPFO this category of claims.

Employers are now increasingly using internet banking to deposit statutory EPF dues since EPFO made it mandatory to use internet banking as the mode of receipt of EPF dues. 96.03% contributions in October 2016 were received online.

In an important judgment delivered by the High Court of Madras in the matter of writ petition filed by Builders Association of India, Madurai, the High Court dismissed the petition praying non enforcement of EPF & MP Act, 1952 every employee employed in or in connection with the work or that factory or establishment, other than an excluded employee, who has not become a member already shall also be entitled and required to become a member of the Fund from the date of joining the factory or establishment.

To expand the reach of convenience offered to EPF members, EPFO has joined the network of Common Services Centers (CSC). A Memorandum of understanding (MoU) has been signed between EPFO and CSC e-Governance Services India Limited (CSC SPV) on 25th October 2016. The MoU is initially for a period of five years. Every year on 14st November, pensioners were required to submit their life certificates. From this year onward, pensioners can submit digital life certificates via Jeevan Pramaan Patra programme through a large number of points of Presence (PoP) of CSC network in addition to those available at EPFO offices. The pensioners living in remote areas can avoid cost and inconvenience of travelling down to the EPF offices or their banks for filing paper based life certificate through this arrangement.

Read More

Retirement Benefits if D.A. Merge with the Basic Pay w.e.f. 01.01.2004 - NFIR

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS

RAILWAY BOARD

E(P&A)II-2012/DC/JCM/1

New Delhi, Dated 17.10.2016

The General Secretary,

NFIR,

3, Chelmsford Road,

New Delhi – 110055

Sub: Merger of Dearness Allowance with the Basci Pay w.e.f. 01.04.2004 – computation of emoluments of Running Staff for granting retirement benefits – reg.

Ref: NFIR’s letter No.IV/RSAC/Conf./Part VII dated 05.09.2016

I am directed to refer to your letter dated 05.09.2016 wherein the Federation has mentioned that Northern Railway has vide letter 720/EW/Misc/Union-Items/2015/E.IV/Loose dated 16.11.2015 correctly computed the emoluments of Running Staff with reference to Dearness Allowance and 30% thereon for the purpose of allowing the retirement benefits to those Running Staff who had retired during the period 01.04.2004 and 31.12.2005.

The matter has been examined in Baord’s office and its observed that the methodology for computation contained in Northern Railway’s letter referred to above, is not in conformity with the instructions on the matter as laid down in Baord’s letter No.E(P&A)II-2004/RS-13 dated 12.10.2004, Northern Railway has accordingly been advised to take immediate corrective action in the matter vide Board’s letter No.E(P&A)II-2014/RS-24 dated 22.07.2016.

Yours faithfully,

sd/-

For Secretary/Railway Board

Source: NFIR

Read More

Voluntary Retirement under Fundamental Rule 56(k), 56(m) and Rule 48 - Amendment orders by Dopt

Voluntary Retirement under Fundamental Rule 56(k), 56(m) and Rule 48  - Amendment orders by Dopt

Government of India

Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions

Department of Personnel and Training

North Block, New Delhi-100 001

Dated : 27th February, 2014

Subject : Voluntary retirement under FR 56(k), etc. and amendment of Rules.

The provisions of Fundamental Rule 56(k), 56(m) and Rule 48 of CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972 relating to acceptance of request of voluntary retirement have been revisited as per the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench judgement dated 4th August, 2010 in 0.A.No.1600/2009 filed by Shri Gopal Singh Purohit Vs UOI & Others to bring them at par with each other.

2. The matter has ‘been examined in consultation with Department of Pension and Pensioners Welfare and the Ministry of Law. FR 56(k) and 56 (m) have been amended vide Extra Ordinary Gazette Notification No.GSR.27(E) dated 17 th January, 2014. It shall be open to the appropriate authority to withhold permission to a Government servant who seeks to retire under FR 56(k) or 56 (m) in the following circumstances:

    (i) If the Government servant is under suspension ; or

    (ii) If a charge sheet has been issued and the disciplinary proceedings are pending; or

    (iii) If judicial proceedings on charges which may amount to grave misconduct, are pending.

Explanation: For the purpose of this clause, judicial proceedings shall be deemed to be pending, if a complaint or report of a police officer, of which the Magistrate takes cognizance, has been made or filed in a criminal proceedings.

3. Copy of the Gazette Notification No.G.S.R.E.(27) dated 17.1.2014 amending FR 56(k) and FR 56(m) is enclosed.

4. All Ministries/Departments are requested to bring the contents of this O.M. to the notice of all concerned.

MINISTRY OF PERSONNEL, PUBLIC GRIEVANCES AND PENSIONS

(Department of Personnel and Training )

NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 17th January, 2014

GS.R. – 27(E) In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to article 309 of the Constitution, and in consultation with the Comptroller and Auditor General in relation to persons serving in the Indian Audit and Accounts Department, the President hereby makes the following rule further to amend the Fundamental Rules, 1922, namely :-

I. (1) These rules may be called the Fundamental (First Amendment) Rules, 2014.

(2) They shall came into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.

2. In the Fundamental Rule, 1922, in rule 56, –

(a) in clause (k), in sub-clause ( I), for item (c), the following, shall be substituted namely :-

"(c) it shall be open to the Appropriate Authority to withhold permission to a Government servant, who seeks to retire under this clause, if,-

    (i) the Government servant is under suspension: or

    (ii) a charge sheet has been issued and the disciplinary proceedings are pending; or

    (iii) if judicial proceedings on charges which may amount to grave misconduct, are pending.

Explanation :- For the purpose of this clause, judicial proceedings shall be deemed to be pending, if a complaint or report of a police officer, of which the Magistrate takes cognizance, has been made or filed in a criminal proceedings.";

(b) for clause (m), the following shall be substituted, namely : –

"(m)A Government servant in Group ‘C’ post who is not governed by any pension rules, may, by giving notice of not less than three months in writing to the Appropriate Authority, retire from service after he has completed thirty years service :

Provided that it shall be open to the Appropriate Authority to withhold permission to a Government servant, who seeks to retire proceedings."

    (i) the Government servant is under suspension: or

    (ii) a charge sheet has been issued and the disciplinary proceedings are pending; or

    (iii) if judicial proceedings on charges which may amount to grave misconduct, are pending.

Explanation :- For the purpose of this clause, judicial proceedings shall be deemed to be pending, if a complaint or report of a police officer, of which the Magistrate takes cognizance, has been made or filed in a criminal proceedings.";

[No.25013/3/2010-Estt. (A-IV)]

MAMTA KUNDR A, Jt. Secy.

Source : www.persmin.gov.in

Read More

Once Again Parliament denied Retirement Age from 60 to 62.

While answering to a question in Parliament today on 22nd August 2013, the Minister of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions Shri. V.Narayanasamy said that ‘at present there is no proposal to increase the age of retirement of Government employees’.

He also added, as per Fundamental Rules 56(a) except as otherwise provided, every Government servant shall retire on attaining the age of 60 years.

Last week formal announcement regarding this policy was expected to declare on 15th August. Now the Central government has denied to pursue the policy of increasing the age of retirement of CG staff once again in Parliament.

Source: CGEN.in

Read More

Government not considering to raise retirement age to 62 years.

Government not consider Retirement Age 62

NEW DELHI : There is raging speculation that the Centre may raise the retirement age of its staff but top sources say there is no such move.

"There is no such plan to raise the retirement age to 62 from 60 years," a reliable source in the government said. There are about 50 lakh central government employees working in various departments including the Railways across the country. 

Source: PTI

Read More

Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) in CRPF, BSF, ITBP, SSB, CISF and AR

Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) in CRPF, BSF, ITBP, SSB, CISF and AR : Statistics of year wise retired CAPF personnel under VRS...

The below information was submitted in Parliament as a written reply by the Minister of Home Affairs on 6th August, the table of CAPF personnel proceeded on Voluntary Retirement during each of the last three years and the current year. And the action taken by the Central Government as remedial measures to stop such cases and improve the service and working of CAPF.

Last three years and current year report is given below...

YEAR		OFFICERS/GOs#		JCOs/SOs#		ORs#		Total
		Male	Female	Male	Female	Male	Female	Total
2010	CRPF	16	1	230	8	2522	27	2804
	BSF	18	#	171	#	5254	#	5443
	ITBP	2	#	42	2	418	#	464
	SSB	7	#	49	#	391	#	447
	CISF	29	1	235	2	611	10	888
	AR	#	#	18	#	715	3	736
2011	CRPF	26	#	280	25	2026	26	2383
	BSF	26	#	202	#	5649	#	5877
	ITBP	4	#	42	1	342	#	389
	SSB	1	#	35	I	I276	#	313
	CISF	23	1	252	4	682	11	973
	AR	#	#	20	2	774	4	800
2012	CRPF	20	1	321	20	4491	23	4876
	BSF	19	#	225	#	3227	#	3471
	ITBP	8	#	78	2	256	#	344
	SSB	4	#	62	#	381	#	447
	CISF	23	1	230	1	778	7	1040
	AR	#	#	24	1	351	2	378
2013 (upto June, 2013)	CRPF	17	1	129	5	1177	14	1343
	BSF	14	#	108	#	1117	#	1239
	ITBP		3	34	1	98	#	136
	SSB	1	#	18		94	1	114
	CISF	1	1	61	1	256	4	324
	AR	#	#	8	1	273	2	284
Total		262	7	2874	77	32159	134	35513

(GOs-Gazetted Officer, JCO/SOs-Junior Commanding Officer/Subordinate Officers, # ORs- Other Ranks)

From the above, it may be seen that the total number of personnel who have proceeded on voluntary retirement during last three years and the current year is only 35513, which is about 1.18% of the Forces posted strength per year. The personnel proceed on voluntary retirement from service mainly due to various personal and domestic reasons including children/family issues, health/illness of self or family, social/family obligations and commitments etc. The Government has taken following steps to improve the service and working conditions of the personnel:

(i) Implementing a transparent, rational and fair leave policy;

(ii) Grant of leave to the Force personnel to attend to their urgent domestic problems/issues/needs;

(iii) Regular interaction, both formal and informal, among Commanders, officers and troops to find out and address their problems;

(iv) Revamping of grievances redressaI machinery;

(v) Regulating duty hours to ensure adequate rest and relief; 

(vi) Improving living conditions through provision of basic amenities! facilities for troops and their families;

(vii) Motivating the forces through increased risk, hardship and other allowances;

(viii) Provision of STD telephone facilities to the troops to facilitate being in touch th their family members and to reduce tension in the remote locations;

(ix) Better medical facilities for troops and their families including introduction of Composite Hospitals with specialized facilities;

(x) Organising talks by doctors and other specialists to address their personal and psychological concerns;

(xi) Yoga and meditation classes for better stress management;

(xii) Recreational and sports facilities and provision of team games and sports etc;

(xiii) Providing welfare measures like Central Police canteen facility to the troops and their families, scholarships to their wards, etc;

(xiv) Giving status of ex-CAPFs personnel to the retired personnel of CAPFs, which is expected to boost the morale of the existing CAPFs personnel and also expected to provide better identity, community recognition and thus higher esteem and pride in the society to the Ex-CAPFs personnel.

Read More

Cabinet Decision Retirement Age increase from 60 to 62 Years.

Cabinet decision to increase retirement age deferred

The government may make the announcement in the Prime Minister’s 15 August address…

A proposal to increase the retirement age of government employees from 60 to 62 years came to the Cabinet on Thursday but a decision was deferred. The government might make the announcement in the Prime Minister’s Independence Day address, his last before general elections in 2014. The ministry of personnel, public grievances and pensions has proposed an increase in retirement age of government employees from 60 to 62 years, top sources confirmed.

There are around five million central government employees in India. The previous occassion the government raised the retirement age of central government employees was in 1998, from 58 to 60 years. The move is meant to ease the financial burden on the government in terms of its pension liabilities, sources said.

The retirement age of professors in all central universities was recently raised to 65 years. D L Sachdev, national secretary of the All India Trade Union Congress, said his union was totally against the increase of the retirement age beyond 60. It would hurt the youth, especially when the government is doing nothing to create jobs for them, Sachdev said.

Congress-affiliated Indian National Trade Union Congress national president Sanjeeva Reddy said his union had been demanding increase in the retirement age to 62 years and would welcome it.

Minister for Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions V Narayanaswami had ruled out an increase in the retirement age to a question in Parliament in the winter session this year. An official in the ministry, when asked, refused to speak about it.

Source : www.business-standard.com

Read More

Retirement age fixation is Govt's sole discretion: SC

Age of superannuation can be reduced or increased unilaterally at the discretion of the Government and courts cannot interfere with such decisions, the Supreme Court has ruled.

A three judge bench of Justices - J M Panchal, Deepak Verma and B Chauhan in a judgement quashed the interim orders of the Allahabad High Court which had directed the Mayawati Government to restore 62 years as the age of superannuation for Government pleaders (advocates).

The apex court agreed with the Government's view that fixing the age falls within the exclusive competence of the State authorities,and thus,the court should not interfere in such policy decisions,unless it was patently unconstitutional.

Citing the Constitutional Bench judgements in the Bishun Narain Misra vs the State of Uttar Pradesh (1965) case, the apex court said reducing the age of retirement could neither be invalid nor could be held to be retrospective as the said rule was a method adopted to tide over the difficult situation which could arise in public services.

"It is evident that even in government services where the terms and conditions of service are governed by the statutory provisions, the Legislature is competent to enhance or reduce the age of superannuation".

"In view of the above, it is beyond our imaginations as why such a course is not permissible for the appellant - State while fixing the age of working of the District Government Advocates," the bench observed.

In the instant case the High Court had stayed the operation of amended provisions of the U.P. Legal Remembrancer Manual (L R Manual) which sought to reduce the retirement age from 62 to 60 years.

It had further directed the State Government to consider the applications for renewal of the all District Government Counsel whose term had already expired, resorting to the unamended provisions of the L.R. Manual and they be allowed to serve till they attain the age upto 62 years.

The High Court under no circumstance could direct the State authorities to consider the cases for renewal/extension under the provisions of the unamended L.R. i.e. non-existing provisions.

Such interim order tantamounts to legislation by judicial orders,"Justice Chauhan writing the judgement observed. The apex court also recalled its earlier ruling in the Roshan Lal Tandon v. Union of India & Ors(1967)that emoluments of Government servants and terms of service".

"could be altered by the employer unilaterally for the reason that conditions of service are governed by statutory rules which can be unilaterally altered by the Government without the consent of the employee."

Source : DDI News

Read More

Increase retirement age of government employees to 62.

On 21st March 2013, there was an unstarred question in Rajya Sabha, about whether there was a proposal to increase the retirement age of Central government employees. The relevant MOS answered there was no such proposal. That’s not quite true, because there is such a proposal floating around and it went to Cabinet sub-committee and an in principle decision to implement was taken by Department of Personnel and Training (DOPT). One should not mix up existence of a proposal with a decision about implementing it. Evidently, a decision has now been taken to increase the age from 60 to 62 years, the last time such an increase took place was in 1998, when there was an increase from 58 to 60 years. Whenever such a decision is taken, debates centre on the big picture. What are arguments for? First, life expectancies are increasing. There is a shortage of good people within government. Let’s tap this expertise. Second, in any case there are extensions in “exceptional circumstances”. But that’s arbitrary and can be shot down by the Appointments Committee of Cabinet (ACC). Why not formalize the system by allowing extensions to everyone? The trouble with this argument is that there will be no finality about 62 either and there will be “exceptional circumstances” beyond 62.

Third, there should be parity. Professors now retire at 65. High Court judges retire at 62, Supreme Court judges retire at 65. The counter-arguments of the big picture are also obvious. India is a young country, young need employment opportunities. Promotional avenues of existing civil servants get blocked. Often, in the private sector, people retire at 60 and there are extensions, with the qualification that extensions are at consolidated monthly emoluments, with no perks. An increase in retirement age occurs with all perks. Therefore, there are significant fiscal costs. While these big picture arguments and counter-arguments are important, my problem is that such decisions aren’t taken because of logical coherence. They are ad hoc decisions, driven by myopic motives. First, increase in retirement age postpones the one-time superannuation burden of severance payments by around Rs 5000 crores. For a government that has drawn up red lines on deficit numbers, that’s a desirable objective, even though it is myopic because it increases fiscal costs on future governments. Second, there’s a clear political cum electoral motive. Outright, if we include Defence, we are talking about 1.5 million Central government employees.

In a broader sense, we are talking about something like 6 million, excluding State governments and quasi-government, all urban. This is therefore a significant component in that 65 million urban household figure. These two points will also be made when the 62 decision is announced. But the one that bothers me most is a third element, one that is invariably never talked about. Such ad hoc decisions are taken because of specific individuals. There is one particular individual whom government wishes to place in one particular position. Once he is placed there, government wishes him to benefit from increase in retirement age. But to ensure he is placed there, one needs to ensure those who are senior to him get out of the way first. After all, supersession is not desirable. Hence, announce the decision after some people have retired at 60 and exited. This is the way decisions are taken. At one level, there is no point complaining, because we have accepted corruption of institutions and systems as fact of life. But when this 62 decision is announced, as it soon will, let us not pretend there are any big picture considerations involved.

Source : www.blogs.economictimes.indiatimes.com

Read More

Librarian superannuation age limit increases from 60 to 62 Year, who are working in the Universities and Colleges.

As per superannuation (Retirement Age Limit) of Teachers are increases by UGC and AICTE vide notification dated 05.03.2011, 22.11.2011 and 23.02.2012 keeping in view, the State Government revised the same for Librarian, Asstt. Librarian of State Government non-agricultural Universities and affiliated colleges as per government resolution No. 2011/(532/11) ViShi-1 dated 22.08.2012 from 60 to 62 years due to lake of men power in state. The State Government decide to increase the superannuation (Retirement Age Limit) from 60 year to 62 year under gone some conditions, which are applies to all Librarian and Asstt. Librarian as mentioned in above Government Resolution.

Click Here to see All Conditions

Download Full Govt. Resolution Click Here

Read More

Know your Age of Retirements & count your Age of Service?

Except as provided in this rule, every non-teaching employee, other than a Class IV employee shall retire from service on the afternoon of the last day of the month in which he attains the age of 58 years. He may be retained in service beyond 58 years only with the previous sanction of the director of Higher Education, Maharashtra State, Pune on public grounds which must be recorded in writing.

A non-teaching employee in Class IV service shall retire, from service on the afternoon of the last day of the month in which he attains the age of 60 years. He may not be retained in service after the age except with the previous sanction of the Director of Higher Education, Maharashtra State, Pune.

Age Retirement Chart
Class Category	Age of Retirement
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT
CLASS - I	58
CLASS - II	58
CLASS - II	58
CLASS - IV	60
TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT
CLASS - I	58
CLASS - II	58
CLASS - II	58
CLASS - IV	60
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
PRINCIPAL	60 + 5 (Conditional)
TEACHING STAFF	60 + 2 (Conditional)
NON-TEACHING STAFF	58
CLASS-III	58
CLASS-IV	60

Download Age Calculator Click Here

Note: The non-teaching employee whose date of birth is the first of the month shall retire from service on the afternoon of the last day of the proceeding month on attaining the age of 58 years or 60 years, as the case may be.

Read More

Latest amendment regarding Refund and Service Request by NSDL

One more amendment is added by Income Tax Department in the process u/s. 143(1) Refund of Income Tax and another u/s. 154 Service Request. The new added Link has provided for downloading by e-mail or post. But now service has been added in Login for e-filing of Income Tax Return website.  To submit a new request, two questions are required to complete.

1. Category
2. Sub-Category

Only one request at a time for the category, assessment year combination is allowed.  Further queries will be allowed only after the previous queries solved.

Detail of Category and Sub-Category are given as under :
Category

• Intimation u/s 143(1)
• Rectification Order u/s 154
• Refund re-issue.

Sub-Category

• Intimation u/s 143(1)

1. Resend Print to ITR Address
2. Resend Print to PAN Address
3. Resend Print to New Address
4. Resend by E-Mail

• Rectification Order u/s 154

1. By Print to ITR Address
2. By Print to PAN Address
3. By Print to NEW Address
4. By E-Mail
5. Latest By Print to ITR Address
6. Latest By Print to PAN Address
7. Latest By Print to New Address
8. Latest By E-Mail.

• Refund re-issue.

1. By Paper to ITR Address
2. By Paper to PAN Address
3. By Paper to New Address

Read More

What are Tax Liability on Retirement and Benefits ?

On retirement, an employee normally receives certain retirement benefits. Such benefits are taxable under the head ‘Salaries’ as “profits in lieu of Salaries” as provided in section 17(3). However, in respect of some of them, exemption from taxation is granted u/s 10 of the Income Tax Act, either wholly or partly. These exemptions are described below:

GRATUITY (Sec. 10(10)):

1. Any death cum retirement gratuity received by Central and State Govt. employees, Defence employees and employees in Local authority shall be exempt.Any gratuity received by persons covered under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 shall be exempt subject to following limits:-
   

• For every completed year of service or part thereof, gratuity shall be exempt to the extent of fifteen days Salary based on the rate of Salary last drawn by the concerned employee.
• The amount of gratuity as calculated above shall not exceed Rs.3,50,000(w.e.f.24.9.97).

1. In case of any other employee, gratuity received shall be exempt subject to the following limits:-

• Exemption shall be limited to half month salary (based on last 10 months average) for each completed year of service
• Rs.3.5 Lakhs whichever is less.

Where the gratuity was received in any one or more earlier previous years also and any exemption was allowed for the same, then the exemption to be allowed during the year gets reduced to the extent of exemption already allowed, the overall limit being Rs. 3.5 Lakhs. As per Board’s letter F.No. 194/6/73-IT(A-1) dated 19.6.73, exemption in respect of gratuity is permissible even in cases of termination of employment due to resignation. The taxable portion of gratuity will quality for relief u/s 89(1). Gratuity payment to a widow or other legal heirs of any employee who dies in active service shall be exempt from income tax (Circular No. 573 dated 21.8.90). Payment of Gratuity (Amendment) Bill, 2010 has proposed to increase the limit to Rs. 10,00,000.

COMMUTATION OF PENSION (SECTION 10(10A)):

1. In case of employees of Central & State Govt. Local Authority, Defence Services and Corporation established under Central or State Acts, the entire commuted value of pension is exempt.
2. In case of any other employee, if the employee receives gratuity, the commuted value of 1/3 of the pension is exempt, otherwise, the commuted value of ½ of the pension is exempt. Judges of S.C. & H.C. shall be entitled to exemption of commuted value upto ½ of the pension (Circular No. 623 dated 6.1.1992).
   

RETRENCHMENT COMPENSATION (Sec. 10(10B)):
Retrenchment compensation received by a workman under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 or any other Act or Rules is exempt subject to following limits:-

1. Compensation calculated @ fifteen days average pay for every completed year of continuous service or part thereof in excess of 6 months.
2. The above is further subject to an overall limit of Rs.5,00,000 for retrenchment on or after 1.1.1997 (Notification No. 10969 dated 25.6.99).

Read More

Congratulation to All Principals of UG & PG Degree Colleges for age of Retirement being 65 Years

As per the UGC declaration and implementation, the UG & PG Degree College Principals having retirement age increase by 5 years i.e. 60 to 65 years. Regarding this the Maharashtra Government also passed their resolutions No. Sankirna-2011/(503/10) Vishi-1 dated 25th February 2011.

In this resolutions, regarding the age of retirement of Principal increased by 5 years it means that the final age of retirement of UG and PG Degree College's Principal is now 65 years.

See here more details

Read More

How to declare Age of Retirement ?

1. Except as provided in this rule, every non-teaching employee, other than a Class IV employee shall retire from service on the afternoon of the last day of the month in which he attains the age of 58 years. He may be retained in service b eyond 58 years only with the previous sanction of the director of Higher Education, Maharashtra State, Pune on public grounds which must be recorded in writing.
2. A non-teaching employee in Class IV service shall retire, from service on the afternoon of the last day of the month in which he attains the age of 60 years. He may not be retained in service after the age except with the previous sanction of the Director of Higher Education, Maharashtra State, Pune.

Note: The non-teaching employee whose date of birth is the first of the month shall retire from service on the afternoon of the last day of the proceeding month on attaining the age of 58 years or 60 years, as the case may be.

Age Retirement Chart
Class Category	Age of Retirement
ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT
CLASS - I	58
CLASS - II	58
CLASS - II	58
CLASS - IV	60
TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT
CLASS - I	58
CLASS - II	58
CLASS - II	58
CLASS - IV	60
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
PRINICPAL	60
TEACHING STAFF	60
NON-TEACHING STAFF	58
CLASS-III	58
CLASS-IV	60

Read More