1. Subject to the provisions of rule 97 I Pension once authorized after final assessment shall not be revised to the disadvantage of the non-teaching employee, unless such revision becomes necessary on account of detection of the clerical error subsequently.
Provided that, no revision of pension to the disadvantage of the pensioner shall be ordered by the Director of Higher Education without the concurrence of the Finance Department if the clearicla error is detected after a period of two years from the date of authorization of pension.
2. For the purpose of sub-rule (1), the retired non-teaching employee concerned shall be served with a notice by the Director of Higher Education requiring him to refund the excess payment of pension within a period of two months from the date of receipt of notice by him.
3. In case the non-teaching employee fails to comply with the notice, the Director of Higher Education shall, by order in writing, direct that such excess payment, shall be adjusted in installments by short payments of pension in future, in one or more installments, as the Director of Higher Eduction may direct.
Provided that, no revision of pension to the disadvantage of the pensioner shall be ordered by the Director of Higher Education without the concurrence of the Finance Department if the clearicla error is detected after a period of two years from the date of authorization of pension.
2. For the purpose of sub-rule (1), the retired non-teaching employee concerned shall be served with a notice by the Director of Higher Education requiring him to refund the excess payment of pension within a period of two months from the date of receipt of notice by him.
3. In case the non-teaching employee fails to comply with the notice, the Director of Higher Education shall, by order in writing, direct that such excess payment, shall be adjusted in installments by short payments of pension in future, in one or more installments, as the Director of Higher Eduction may direct.
0 comments:
Post a Comment